christian louboutin uk would like to make it extremely clear that despite recent unsuccessful court battles suggesting otherwise, they still really much own the trademark to their Pantone-18 'Chinese Red' soles.
In a statement released by Louboutin yesterday,christian louboutin sale the enterprise stated: "Recent commentary in several articles from newspapers and blogs about the French court decision in the Zara case...either implies or states that through this ruling we certainly have lost our rights to our world-famous red-sole trademark. We would like to clarify that what has been disputed and canceled is actually simply one French registration on the trademark." Adding that they "continue to own valid and enforceable trademark rights...through the entire world" and "will carry on and protect and enforce [the trademark's] rights."
The clarification comes every week after christian louboutin shoes unsuccessfully aimed to sue high-street chain Zara for selling a red-soled shoe similar to their 'Yo Yo' style. A French court ruled that "there was no proven probability of confusion between Louboutin's shoes and the Zara pair", and ordered Louboutin to spend Zara 2,016. It was the climax of the case which had rumbled on for a year. Meanwhile, Louboutin continue to ploughing ahead with their battle to stop Yves Saint Laurent from selling red-soled shoes - which first appeared in YSL's Resort 2011 collection. The Manhattan court of Appeal's decision on whether they should call grant an original injunction against YSL is expected over the summer.
没有评论:
发表评论